Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 10:16:44 GMT
Solution pp pablo married Jesus Espelosin We need your help to continue reporting Become a member of Nuevatribuna Let us agree that the quality of democracy can be measured and let us also agree that the best way to do so, that is, the platinum iridium bar of democracy, is the Annual Democratic Index calculated and published by The Economist . Well, with this convention admitted, Spanish democracy has lost quality between 2020 and 2021. Let's agree. But let's analyze what happened to cause this qualitative decline to occur. I am moved to propose this analysis by reading another one, made by an eminent commentator whom I follow for his excellent articles, although he is excessively concerned about the pernicious effects of Pedro Sánchez on humanity. According to this comment, Sánchez is guilty of that loss that has caused us to descend to the second division of democracy and, this has allowed me to intone the Juliano, are you too The Economist?, when thinking that such a prestigious medium had switched to anti-Sanchism.
And I got to work. To do this, logically, I went to the source, that is, to the study that The Economist , very kindly and generously, publishes for free on the web without more than providing a few personal data. The truth is that, from the beginning, it is easy to discover why we have descended in one year to the category of flawed democracy since the study itself, perhaps Guatemala Mobile Number List surprised by the fact, highlights it on page 12. Immediately, It begins by saying that “ a deterioration of 0.18 points has been enough to relegate the country from the classification of full democracy to defective democracy .” The aforementioned Annual Democracy Index has been published by The Economist since 2006 and, using sixty indicators, it classifies countries by giving them a “democracy grade” between 0 and 10, which makes them worthy of being in four categories, “full democracies”, with score between 8 and 10, “defective democracies”, with scores between 6 and 7.99, “hybrid regimes”, with scores between 4 and and “authoritarian regimes”, between 0 and.
Spanish democracy obtained a score of which made it belong to the highest category, only points above South Korea, the last country deserving of that podium. Our country was in 22nd place out of the classifieds. By the way, we were above France, the USA, Italy, Belgium or Portugal, to give a few examples. Those 0.18 points have lowered our score to , below the limit of the door to democratic paradise and makes us drop two places in a classification in which France and Israel are ahead of us, despite the fact that neither These two countries become full democracies, according to the study. The evil of many cannot, in this case, be a consolation for dictators, but The Economist recognizes a global decline in democratic quality. And, once we have talked about the “quantity of quality”, let's talk about the “quality of quality”, that is, why we are less democratic.
And I got to work. To do this, logically, I went to the source, that is, to the study that The Economist , very kindly and generously, publishes for free on the web without more than providing a few personal data. The truth is that, from the beginning, it is easy to discover why we have descended in one year to the category of flawed democracy since the study itself, perhaps Guatemala Mobile Number List surprised by the fact, highlights it on page 12. Immediately, It begins by saying that “ a deterioration of 0.18 points has been enough to relegate the country from the classification of full democracy to defective democracy .” The aforementioned Annual Democracy Index has been published by The Economist since 2006 and, using sixty indicators, it classifies countries by giving them a “democracy grade” between 0 and 10, which makes them worthy of being in four categories, “full democracies”, with score between 8 and 10, “defective democracies”, with scores between 6 and 7.99, “hybrid regimes”, with scores between 4 and and “authoritarian regimes”, between 0 and.
Spanish democracy obtained a score of which made it belong to the highest category, only points above South Korea, the last country deserving of that podium. Our country was in 22nd place out of the classifieds. By the way, we were above France, the USA, Italy, Belgium or Portugal, to give a few examples. Those 0.18 points have lowered our score to , below the limit of the door to democratic paradise and makes us drop two places in a classification in which France and Israel are ahead of us, despite the fact that neither These two countries become full democracies, according to the study. The evil of many cannot, in this case, be a consolation for dictators, but The Economist recognizes a global decline in democratic quality. And, once we have talked about the “quantity of quality”, let's talk about the “quality of quality”, that is, why we are less democratic.